Navigation auf uzh.ch
The pdf version of the program can be downloaded here (PDF, 952 KB).
The book of abstracts can be downloaded here (PDF, 2 MB).
*Panel titles were generated by ChatGPT based on submitted titles and edited by the conference organizers.
14:15 – 17:00 |
PHD WORKSHOP OF THE “MITTELBAUNETZWERK WISSENSCHAFTSKOMMUNIKATION” |
19:00 |
CONFERENCE GET TOGETHER |
08:30 – 09:00 |
REGISTRATION AND COFFEE |
09:00 – 09:15 |
WELCOME BY THE CONFERENCE ORGANIZERS |
09:15 – 10:00 |
KEYNOTE: COMMUNICATION AND BUILDING PUBLIC TRUST IN AI-POWERED APPLICATIONS |
10:00 – 11:00 | PARALLEL PANEL I (details below) AI discourses in the news media | Room: HG E 1.2 Toward standards for communication with AI | Room: HG E 1.1 |
11:00 – 11:20 |
COFFEE BREAK |
11:20 – 12:40 | PARALLEL PANEL II (details below) Exploring imaginaries of AI | Room: HG E 1.2 Climate- & health-related science communication | Room: HG E 1.1 |
12:40 – 14:00 |
LUNCH |
14:00 – 15:00 | PANEL III (details below) Public perceptions of AI | Room: HG E 1.2 |
15:00 – 15:20 |
COFFEE BREAK |
15:20 – 16:20 | PARALLEL PANEL IV (details below) Opportunities of AI imagery | Room: HG E 1.2 Qualitative research on AI perceptions | Room: HG E 1.1 |
16:20 – 16:40 |
TRANSFER TO UZH |
16:40 – 17:30 |
PANEL DISCUSSION: LINKING SCIENCE COMMUNICATION RESEARCH AND PRACTICE IN THE AGE OF AI |
17:40 – 18:40 |
MEETING OF THE DGPuK SCIENCE COMMUNICATION DIVISION |
19:00 |
CONFERENCE DINNER |
09:00 – 09:45 |
KEYNOTE: HOW AI IS CHANGING THE KNOWLEDGE ORDER OF SOCIETY Christoph Neuberger (FU Berlin / Weizenbaum Institut für die vernetzte Gesellschaft) Room: HG E 1.2 |
09:45 – 10:45 |
PANEL V (details below) |
10:45 – 11:05 |
COFFEE BREAK |
11:05 – 12:25 | PARALLEL PANEL VI (details below) ChatGPT's role in science communication | Room: HG E 1.2 Shaping public discourse: Scientists as communicators | Room: HG E 1.1 |
12:25 – 12:40 |
CLOSING & FAREWELL |
12:40 – 13:00 | GRAB A LUNCH BAG |
AI DISCOURSES IN THE NEWS MEDIAChair: Friederike Hendriks |
TOWARD STANDARDS FOR COMMUNICATION WITH AIChair: Jana Egelhofer |
Visualizations of invisible technologies. How German print media illustrate articles on artificial intelligence Carolin Moser, Tabea Lüders, Melanie Leidecker-Sandmann |
Developing quality criteria for AI reporting: A modular design for journalism practice and science communication |
AI coverage of legacy and alternative news media. Comparing framing and choice of sources Markus Schug, Helena Bilandzic, Susanne Kinnebrock, Lena Sedlmeier |
Promoting quality communication of AI: Insights from an AI research project |
Politicisation and polarisation on an industry-shaped ground: Public discourse and actors around AI in the French press and social media (2012-2022) Panos Tsimpoukis, Nikos Smyrnaios, Pierre Ratinaud |
Systematic review of strategies for science communication to mitigate mis- and disinformation |
EXPLORING IMAGINARIES OF AIChair: Melanie Leidecker-Sandmann
|
CLIMATE- & HEALTH-RELATED SCIENCE COMMUNICATION (open panel)Chair: Elena Link |
Generative AI in science communication research: The sociotechnical imaginaries informing in the fields’ journal and publisher authorship policies |
Detecting manipulated visuals: A computational approach in the climate change discourse |
Negotiating AI as a sociotechnical phenomenon: Competing imaginaries of AI by stakeholders in the US, China, and Germany |
Politicization of science in German COVID-19 media coverage: Theoretical conceptualization and empirical evidence |
Visions of AI in the public eye: Comparing news coverage in China, Germany, and the U.S. (2012-2021) |
Science calls to action: Explainer videos as activist tool to promote sustainable streaming practices |
Restructuring social science communication in social media: An ethnographic study on the influence of algorithmic imaginaries in content creation |
“However I judge it, I think it‘s a gut feeling”: Examining (un)trustworthiness cues in YouTube videos by real and feigned experts |
PUBLIC PERCEPTIONS OF AIChair: Julia Metag |
More harm than good? Germans’ attitudes towards generative AI in science communication |
AI talking science: Two experimental studies on the perception of large language models as a source of scientific information |
Predicting and describing the use of generative AI in science-related information search: Insights from a multinational survey |
OPPORTUNITIES OF AI IMAGERYChair: Sabrina H. Kessler |
QUALITATIVE RESEARCH ON AI PERCEPTIONSChair: Niels Mede |
An AI-based social media generator - STEM research artificially communicated |
How do laypeople assess their trust in LLM-based chatbots when they seek science-related information? Results from a qualitative interview study using a hybrid trust approach |
AI Avatars in science communication: When Einstein and Curie resurrect |
‘Not for me’: An exploratory study into inclusive science communication about artificial intelligence in the Netherlands |
Can AI generated imagery be used to communicate future climate scenarios? |
How issues travel across social conversation: The case of AI in Italy |
COMMUNICATING WITH AI IN SCIENCE JOURNALISM AND SCIENCE COMMUNICATIONChair: Michelle Riedlinger |
The future of science communication - which role plays generative AI? A Delphi study with communicators and scientists |
University communication in the age of AI: First insights into the use and perspectives of generative AI tools |
Meet my new colleague, ChatGPT: How German science journalists perceive and use generative Artificial Intelligence in the selection, production, and distribution of news |
CHATGPT’S ROLE IN SCIENCE COMMUNICATIONChair: Anne M. Dijkstra |
SHAPING PUBLIC DISCOURSE: SCIENTISTS AS COMMUNICATORS (open panel)Chair: Marina Joubert |
“Chat GPT, is the influenza vaccination useful?” Comparing perceived argument strength and correctness of pro-vaccination-arguments from AI and scientific experts |
Centralized vs. decentralized science communication in universities: Differences in the professional role identities of university communicators in various organizational contexts |
How Generative AI Imagines and Communicates Science: Interviewing ChatGPT from the perspective of different audience segments |
Between brokerage and advocacy – the role of organisations as science communicators in the COVID-19 pandemic |
How well can ChatGPT replace human coders in quantitative content analysis? A case study |
From labs to politics: A mixed-methods study on researchers’ participation in political debates |
The impact of transparency: A qualitative investigation of LLM-based chatbots in science-related information search |
Witnessing online harassment against scientists: Effects on scientists and public perceptions of science |